Instructions: You are to interview two people and record their responses on this form. You should state their name and their comments to your solution to the identified problem.
VI. I interviewed two individuals to see what their response would be to my (our) plan. Their responses are as follows.
I had interviewed my father about censorship in the media. at first he didnt see a problem with how the media was censored but as i set examples such as artist who express themselves through explicit arts and the government limits the exposure of their arts to the public. As i set more and more exaples of media censoring he began to disagree with it. He clearly stated "I never knew the government had so much control on how the people express themselves. I thought this was America and people should be able to have their rights." He later elaborated by explaining that he does not believe children should watch porn but he says it is a part of growing up and wether parents want to or not their children will be exposed to it sooner or later. But he still agrees that media should not be censored and concluded with agreeing that parents should have the control of over what their children can watch.
Another of my interview included my high school graduate Jenny. As I explained What media Censorship was and included exaples she started to explain that people's opinions and expressions should not be limited by government control. She disagrees with the censorship but also explained that with her kids being young and such she also does not want them to be overwhelmed with the negativity of pornogrophy and violence available all over the media. When I explained our solution she said she agreed with the media not being censored as long as she as a parent could set a limit as to how much negative media could reach their media.
VII. My (our) answer, based on our research, to their objections and concerns are
I think that as long as we explain to the public why censorship within the media is a problem and thoroughly explain our solutions and how they would work they would not disagree with it.
Instructions: You are to interview two people and record their responses on this form. You should state their name and their comments to your solution to the identified problem.
VI. I interviewed two individuals to see what their response would be to my (our) plan. Their responses are as follows.
I had interviewed my father about censorship in the media. at first he didnt see a problem with how the media was censored but as i set examples such as artist who express themselves through explicit arts and the government limits the exposure of their arts to the public. As i set more and more exaples of media censoring he began to disagree with it. He clearly stated "I never knew the government had so much control on how the people express themselves. I thought this was America and people should be able to have their rights." He later elaborated by explaining that he does not believe children should watch porn but he says it is a part of growing up and wether parents want to or not their children will be exposed to it sooner or later. But he still agrees that media should not be censored and concluded with agreeing that parents should have the control of over what their children can watch.
Another of my interview included my high school graduate Jenny. As I explained What media Censorship was and included exaples she started to explain that people's opinions and expressions should not be limited by government control. She disagrees with the censorship but also explained that with her kids being young and such she also does not want them to be overwhelmed with the negativity of pornogrophy and violence available all over the media. When I explained our solution she said she agreed with the media not being censored as long as she as a parent could set a limit as to how much negative media could reach their media.
VII. My (our) answer, based on our research, to their objections and concerns are
I think that as long as we explain to the public why censorship within the media is a problem and thoroughly explain our solutions and how they would work they would not disagree with it.